Timing is everything in crypto, and ACTFUN’s timing could not have been worse for the people who trusted it.
On the very same day Circle flipped the switch on its long-awaited Arc mainnet, a launch backed by BlackRock, Visa, and Mastercard, one of the chain’s earliest community launchpads allegedly vanished with investor funds within hours of going live. It’s the kind of story that tends to define how an entire ecosystem’s early days get remembered, and it landed on what was supposed to be Arc’s biggest day yet.
What ACTFUN Was Actually Claiming To Be
Before any of this happened, ACTFUN had pitched itself as something genuinely different from the usual launchpad playbook. According to its own documentation, ACTFUN described itself as a community-mined token launchpad on Arc Network, where users earned tokens by writing posts on-chain rather than buying in early and hoping for a pump. The platform’s pitch was built entirely around the absence of the usual red flags: no presales, no team allocation, and pointedly, given what followed, no rug.
Under ACTFUN’s stated model, every token launched through the platform reserved 95% of its supply for community miners, with the remaining 5% going straight into a liquidity pool at graduation. There was supposed to be no team allocation, no VC cut, and no separate migration transaction, just a transparent, time-limited mining window followed by automatic trading. The platform’s live site showed its native sale had closed on September 14, 2026, with refunds and ACT token claims scheduled to open on September 16 at 15:00 UTC, the same day this story broke.
How The Rug Was First Reported
News of the collapse broke through reports that ACTFUN had officially rugged its community, with the platform’s founder deleting his Telegram account and reportedly absconding with funds invested by community members.
I think the detail that stands out most in that account is the deleted Telegram. Telegram groups are typically where a launchpad’s community lives day to day, coordination, support, and trust all flow through that channel. A founder deleting it entirely, rather than simply going quiet, reads as a far more deliberate signal than an ordinary project going dark. It’s the digital equivalent of a storefront owner not just closing early, but ripping the sign off the building on their way out.
The Community’s Real-Time Panic
The scramble that followed wasn’t limited to outside observers piecing things together after the fact, it played out in real time from people who’d actually put money into the platform. Community members captured that panic directly, publicly demanding answers and accusing the team outright of running a scam, asking pointedly where the liquidity pool had gone and warning that they intended to come after whoever was responsible.
That kind of reaction is worth sitting with for a moment, because it captures something a headline summary can’t. Behind every “rug pull” story is someone who genuinely believed a promised refund window and a scheduled token claim were coming, only to watch both evaporate on the exact day they were supposed to arrive. The anger isn’t abstract, it’s the sound of someone realizing, in real time, that the liquidity they were counting on simply isn’t there anymore.
Compounding the situation further, ACTFUN’s own social presence has since vanished, mirroring the founder’s disappearance from Telegram. Between a deleted Telegram, deleted official social media pages, and a founder nowhere to be found, the platform has effectively erased every channel its community once used to reach it, leaving affected users with no team, no support line, and no clear way to even publicly pressure anyone for a response.
The Broader Pattern Already Forming On Arc
What’s happened with ACTFUN doesn’t appear to be an isolated incident, and that’s arguably the more important part of this story. Just as Arc’s mainnet was going live, security firms issued public alerts warning investors to watch for copycat rug pull schemes appearing across the network, specifically flagging that fake versions of already-popular launchpad tokens like ARGUS and TOLLY had begun circulating within hours of launch, urging users to carefully verify contract addresses before trading anything.
Separately, concerns had already surfaced days earlier around long.supply, another Arc-based launchpad, after prominent crypto commentators warned that the platform’s custom cross-chain bridge for stock tokens wasn’t built on established, audited infrastructure like Wormhole or LayerZero, meaning the project team could reportedly shut the bridge down and withdraw locked funds at will. Arc recorded massive trading activity on its very first day, and that scale of volume, arriving all at once on a brand-new chain, is precisely the kind of environment opportunistic bad actors tend to target hardest.
Arc Mainnet Officially Goes Live
All of this is unfolding against the backdrop of a genuinely major moment in crypto infrastructure. Circle Internet Group officially launched the public mainnet of Arc on September 16, 2026, describing it as an open Layer 1 blockchain purpose-built for financial markets, real-time money movement, and what the company calls agentic economic activity.
Arc’s most distinctive design choice is that transaction fees are paid entirely in USDC rather than a volatile native gas token, paired with what Circle describes as sub-second, deterministic finality. The network opened with eleven founding validators drawn directly from traditional finance, including BlackRock, Visa, Mastercard, Standard Chartered, and DTCC, alongside Circle itself, a validator lineup that’s unusually institutional for a brand-new Layer 1 chain. Circle executives framed Arc as a network built on the premise that money should work the way the internet works.
The scale of day-one participation is notable too. Circle said more than 100 institutional and ecosystem builders were live on the network from its very first block, with protocols like Aave, Uniswap, and Morpho among the applications available immediately. Arc’s public testnet, which ran ahead of the mainnet launch, reportedly processed hundreds of millions of transactions during its testing period alone.
The Launchpads Racing To Build On Arc
Beneath the institutional headline names, a genuinely large crowd of retail-facing launchpads had already positioned themselves to launch alongside Arc’s public debut. Platforms including ArcPad, Tolly, and Flipt were reportedly already active on Arc’s private mainnet ahead of the public opening, with plans to open fully to the public on launch day itself. Separately, projects like aka.fun, a MemeFi launchpad structured around Uniswap liquidity rather than traditional bonding curves, along with UnitFlow, Synthra, Tower, Hibachi, and Sidoor, had all been building out different pieces of Arc’s broader retail ecosystem in the lead-up to launch.
That density of launchpads matters for exactly the reason ACTFUN’s collapse illustrates. A brand-new chain drawing this much simultaneous retail attention, combined with genuinely large day-one trading volume, creates ideal conditions for exactly the kind of rapid, opportunistic rug pull ACTFUN’s community now says it experienced. When dozens of platforms are all racing to capture early attention on the same network at once, distinguishing a legitimate team from an exit scam in the first few hours is often genuinely difficult, and the incentive for bad actors to move fast before scrutiny catches up is higher than it would be on a more mature chain.
What This Means Going Forward
I don’t think ACTFUN will be the last launchpad to collapse this way on Arc, and honestly, I’d be surprised if it were. New chains reliably attract this exact pattern in their earliest days: genuine institutional infrastructure arrives at the top, while a wave of smaller, unaudited platforms rushes in underneath it chasing the same early attention, and a portion of them inevitably turn out to be built on nothing more than the promise of trust rather than any real mechanism enforcing it.
For anyone looking to actually participate in Arc’s ecosystem going forward, the more durable signal is likely to be volume and team transparency rather than clever tokenomics pitches. Platforms with real institutional backing, established audit histories, or partnerships already disclosed through Circle’s own official channels are a meaningfully safer starting point than a brand-new launchpad promising to have solved rug pulls entirely through mechanism design alone. ACTFUN made exactly that promise. It didn’t last a single full day after its claims and refund schedule went public and by the time its community started demanding answers, there was no one left to answer them.
Disclosure: This is not trading or investment advice. Always do your research before buying any cryptocurrency or investing in any services.
Follow us on Twitter @themerklehash to stay updated with the latest Crypto, NFT, AI, Cybersecurity, and Metaverse news!